Canvas Mass Course Creation for Summer 2018

2018 Teaching Practices Survey

From February 27 to March 21, 2018, UBC will be running the 2018 Teaching Practices Survey. This is an opportunity for UBC faculty and others with teaching responsibility to share their teaching practices and provide confidential feedback about UBC’s teaching climate. Those eligible to participate will receive an email invitation to the survey.

To learn more about the survey, visit: ctlt.ubc.ca/teaching-practices-survey.

Graduate Defence – Christine Bridge

Christine Bridge, PhD, LLED

Land Education and Reconciliation: Exploring Educators’ Practice
Supervisors: Dr. Teresa Dobson (LLED), Dr. Jan Hare (LLED), Dr. Candace Galla (LLED)
Wednesday, March 14, 2018 | 9:00 a.m. | Graduate Student Centre, Room 203, 6371 Crescent Road


Committee Members:
Dr. Teresa Dobson (LLED)
Dr. Jan Hare (LLED)
Dr. Candace Galla (LLED)

University Examiners:
External examiner: Dr. Susan Dion (York University)
University examiners: Dr. Susan Gerofsky (EDCP), Dr. Cynthia Nicol (EDCP)


Abstract:

The focus of this narrative inquiry was to engage educators in a series of land-based activities that prompted them to consider how the notion of “land as first teacher” (Haig-Brown & Dannenmann, 2008) might contribute to interdisciplinary approaches to land education, ecological recovery, and reconciliation in their classroom praxis. The 4Rs of respect, relevance, reciprocity, and responsibility (Kirkness & Barnhardt, 1991) provided an ethical community protocol that directed an exploration into ways to integrate processes of reconciliation into educators’ teaching practice. The research took place on the University of British Columbia (UBC) Vancouver campus, situated on the traditional, ancestral, and unceded territory of the Musqueam people.

Over the span of four months, a participant group consisting of four graduate students, three undergraduate students, and two course instructors from the UBC Faculty of Education, engaged in a series of land-based activities on various public sites on or near the UBC campus that acknowledge and re-inscribe Indigenous presence. Following each activity, participants were asked to reflect on a series of guiding questions. Data sources included pre-study questionnaires, reflective journals, semi-structured interviews, and my own field notes and observations.

Findings of the research suggested dominant discourses regarding the use of land and ethics towards the land were effectively challenged over the course of the study. Participants expressed how they might re-shape their instructional approaches to include processes of reconciliation in a multitude of ways, and expressed commitment to build their own personal and professional knowledge, and awareness of Indigenous perspectives to help further these processes.

The study builds on a body of research exploring the effectiveness of decolonizing teacher education programs. It advances land education as a pedagogical model, and thus addresses the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada’s (2015a) calls to action for increased Indigenous content for learners at all levels. Further, it attends to the urgent need for reconciliation that runs deep in our country, by promoting mutually respectful relationships between Indigenous and non-Indigenous peoples (TRC, 2015b).

Graduate Defence – Bong-gi Sohn

Bong-gi Sohn, PhD, TESL

From Language Learners to Bilingual Providers: Second Language Socialization of Bilingual Mothers in South Korea
Supervisors: Dr. Steven Talmy (LLED), Dr. Ryuko Kubota (LLED), Dr. Patsy Duff (LLED)
Friday, March 16, 2018 | 12:30 p.m. | Graduate Student Centre, Room 200, 6371 Crescent Road


Committee Members:
Dr. Steven Talmy (LLED)
Dr. Ryuko Kubota (LLED)
Dr. Patsy Duff (LLED)

University Examiners:
External examiner: Dr. Mihyon Jeon (York University)
University examiners: Dr. Don Baker and Dr. Marlene Asselin


Abstract:

In the context of unprecedented globalization and migration flows, South Korea, known for promoting the modern nation-state’s ‘one-nation, one-language’ ideology, has undergone recalibration of its national identity and language ideologies. Since the mid-2000s, the South Korean government has developed a dual contradictory bilingual framework—assimilative Korean as a Second Language and celebratory multilingual development—particularly for damunhwa (multicultural) families consisting of international marriages between Korean men and foreign women and their children. Despite the government’s enthusiastic development of language policy, little is known of the grounds on which this bilingual initiative was established and how it is practiced in families. Adopting an approach that Bronson and Watson-Gegeo (2008) have called “language socialization as topic,” this qualitative study employed a document analysis and interviews to investigate the representational practices of foreign mothers across their lifespan in South Korea. I first address how the national-level language policy guides the regulation of foreign mothers’ four linear life trajectories: marriage, migration, childbirth and education, and home economics. Findings from the policy analysis represent the government’s (1) emphasis on damunhwa mothers’ exclusive use of Korean, (2) selective recommendation of heritage/foreign language for nationalistic purposes, and (3) discouragement of heritage language use in damunhwafamilies. They also demonstrate the government’s lack of concern with the roles of Korean fathers in family language socialization. The four damunhwa mothers in this study—from Japan, China, Vietnam, and Kyrgyzstan—presented their survival stories on learning to become dedicated mothers who are expected to use Korean with their children. Their narratives also demonstrate how the linguistic hierarchy is exacerbated and how they are demoralized in their bilingual workplaces. The mothers’ stated promotion of heritage languages often serves instrumental purposes rather than fostering bilingual and bicultural identities. These findings explain how damunhwa mothers have become the heart of linguistic nationalism in globalized times for South Korea, where the government has failed to recognize the fundamental importance of the situated nature of multilingual socialization of families. Through illuminating what has been neglected by policy makers, this dissertation calls for more equitable and gender-sensitive approaches to bilingual education in transnational and translingual times.